Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Olga Grushin

"From its very birth at the dawn of humanity," the man was saying in a mild voice bred of generations of intellectuals, "pictorial art has served two separate functions: ritualistic and decorative. In its primitive stages, art amounted to, on one hand, drawing pictures of slain animals on cave walls to ensure some friendly spirit's help in a hunt, and on the other, fashioning necklaces out of seashells to make savage women more bearable to look at. Gradually, as man matured, these two original functions-communicating with the spirit world and making the present world more pleasant to live in-crystallized into what I see as art's two great raisons d' etre, if you will: the search for the Divine and the search for Beauty. In the Dark Ages, when man was weighed down by superstitions, the Divine predominated at the expense of Beauty, but at the very peak of artistic development-and by that, of course, I mean the age of the Renaissance-the two searches grew more and more intertwined until they became one. And for one brief moment God was beauty, nature was God, and the Divine and the Beautiful could be found equally in Titian's voluptuous nudes and in Mantegna's emaciated saints. The miraculous balance lasted hardly more than a century, yet it brought about a flowering of genius so extraordinary that it sustains us to this day. But inevitably, as the world moved on, life gained the upper hand over art, and the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, with their new mantras of enlightenment and reason, led to the beginning of the end. As art's two purposes drifted apart once again, creation found itself boxed into increasingly narrow compartments: portrait, epic painting, genre painting, religious painting, landscape, still life...Then, with the advent of our own monstrous age of machines and secularism, Beauty was killed by industrialization, God was declared persona non grata by so-called progressive thinkers, and thus, in a blink of time, both higher artistic purposes lost all meaning. What are we left with? A sad bunch of labels and occasional pathetic attempts to recover at least something of art's previous glory, either by desperate proclaimers of art for art's sake, who try to restore Beauty but invariably end up painting poodles and shepherdesses or the aesthetic equivalent thereof, or by eager revolutionaries who seek the Divine in a red banner of humanity, hoping to use art for the common good as if it were a loaf of bread or a pair of boots-needless to say, in vain, for a purpose does not become sacred merely by virtue of being noble."

                                                   -Olga Grushin
                                                   The Dream Life of Sukhanov

Sunday, May 06, 2012

 A Pirate Looks At Fifty-One
In November I turned fifty years old. In my short life I've seen the computer industry explode. My first computer was a total piece of shit Timex Sinclair that was a complete joke. Between then and when I got a "real" computer in 1986-a Mac Se Plus with a whopping 512k of memory-there were Trash 80's, Commodore 64's, and other toys that obviously pale in comparison to today's devices. When Microsoft introduced Windows, I didn't immediately switch over. Eventually, like a good chunk of the world, I did. I've gotten comfortable with the OS, but most of the creatives and coders I know use Macs.  Since I can comfortably put myself in neither category, I'm allowed some leeway.

Life, pre-Google, consisted of services like Compuserve and Prodigy and with search choices like Lycos.Yahoo is what I was using at the time. The web was not pretty in the late eighties and early nineties. It had very little graphic capability even with a T1 line.  YouTube would never had worked.

Eventually, I got turned on to Google. Since I had lived in the area-Google's original URL was google.stanford.edu-I figured these guys and girls weren't complete retards. I was right. I presently use most of their services. As for the privacy thing...well, the U.S. government knows more than a few things about me. I generally trust Stanford graduates and computer geeks.  The government? Their track record speaks for itself.

Saturday, March 17, 2012

 God Is Too Big For One Religion
Both revelation and delusion are attempts at the solution of problems. Artists and scientists realize that no solution is ever final, but that each new creative step points the way to the next artistic or scientific problem. In contrast, those who embrace religious revelation and delusional systems tend to see them as unshakable and permanent...
Religious faith is an answer to the problem of life...The majority of mankind want or need some all-embracing belief system which purports to provide an answer to life's mysteries, and are not necessarily dismayed by the discovery that their belief system, which they proclaim as "the truth", is incompatible with the beliefs of other people. One's man's faith is another's delusion...
Whether a belief is considered to be a delusion or not depends partly upon the intensity with which it is defended, and partly upon the number of people subscribing to it.
 -Anthony Shorr
 Feet Of Clay
There's nothing more dangerous than a misinformed, intolerant fanatic. Any belief system which has as its goal the creation of mindless, impotent automatons--I have some "crazy", Brave New World-type theories on drugs and alcohol--and which discourages the objective, unemotional analysis of its precepts is one which is probably not worth adhering to.

Monday, March 12, 2012

An Inconvenient Truth

In November I gave all my computer hardware to someone for safekeeping. In the past, this stuff has had the uncanny ability to sprout legs. Perhaps this was due to statements I made to certain people in which I insinuated that I was going to start posting the pictures of my stalkers on the Internet. Perhaps it may have been due to me announcing the possible subject matter of future blog posts. (e.g., Angels, Voodoo and the Rise of Depression in America) I do know that I've had a difficult time hanging on to cameras and laptops.
 
Now that I'm using public computers and can no longer hack databases, pirate media or watch porn, I wonder what excuse will be generated to justify blocking my access to the Internet. I quiver in anticipation.

Posted via email from Pier 51

Wednesday, March 07, 2012

The Independence of Cyber Space

Anonymous declare a Note on Independence of Cyber Space :

Governments of the Industrial World, you weary giants of flesh and steel, we come from the Internet, the new home of Mind.

On behalf of the future, we ask you of the past to leave us alone. You are not welcome among us. You have no sovereignty where we gather.

We have no elected government, nor are we likely to have one; therefore we address you with no greater authority than that with which liberty it always speaks. We declare the global social space we are building to be naturally independent of the tyrannies you seek to impose on us. You have no moral right to rule us, nor do you possess any methods of enforcement we have true reason to fear. You are toothless wolves among rams, reminiscing of days when you ruled the hunt, seeking a return of your bygone power.

Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed. You have neither solicited nor received ours. We did not invite you. You do not know us, nor do you know our world. The Internet does not lie within your borders. Do not think that you can build it, as though it were a public construction project. You cannot. It is an act of nature and it grows itself through our collective actions.

We have watched as you remove our rights, one by one, like choice pieces of meat from a still struggling carcass, and we have collectively cried out against these actions of injustice. You have neither usage nor purpose in the place we hold sacred. If you come, you will be given no more and no less power than any other single person has, and your ideas will be given the same consideration anyone else would receive You are neither special, righteous, nor powerful here.

You have not engaged in our great and gathering conversation, nor did you create the wealth of our marketplaces. You do not know our culture, our ethics, or the unwritten codes that already provide our society more order than could be obtained by any of your impositions.

You claim there are problems among us that you need to solve. You use this claim as an excuse to invade our precincts. This claim has been used throughout the centuries by many an invading kingdom, and your claims are no different, nor do they ring any less hollow. Your so called problems do not exist. Where there are real conflicts, where there are wrongs, we will identify them and address them by our means. We are forming our own Social Contract. This governance will arise according to the conditions of our world, not yours.

The Internet consists of transactions, relationships and thought itself; arrayed like a standing wave in the web of our communications. It is the last truly free place in this world, and you seek to destroy even that freedom. Ours is a world that is both everywhere and nowhere, but it is not where bodies live.

We are creating a world that all may enter without privilege or prejudice accorded by race, economic power, military force, or station of birth. A place where anyone, at any time, is as free to come and go, to say and be silent, and to think however they wish, without fear, as anyone else. There is no status beyond the merit of your words and the strength of your ideas.

We are creating a world where anyone anywhere may express his or her beliefs, no matter how singular, without fear of being coerced into silence or conformity.

Your legal concepts of property, expression, identity, movement, and context do not apply to us. They are all based on matter, and there is no matter here. There are only ideas and information, and they are free.

Our identities have no bodies, so, unlike you, we cannot obtain order by physical coercion. We believe that from ethics, enlightened self-interest, and the commonweal, our governance will emerge. Our identities may be distributed across many of your jurisdictions.

The only law that all our constituent cultures would generally recognize is the Golden Rule. We hope we will be able to build our particular solutions on that basis. But we cannot accept the solutions you are attempting to impose.

In the United States, you repeatedly try to pass unjust legislature in an attempt to restrict us. You disguise this legislature under a variety of different names, and pass excuses that they are for our own protection. We have watched you, time and time again; attempt to censor us under the guise of Copyright protection, or for the protection of Children. These laws come in many shapes and forms, in the name of ACTA, PIPA, COICA, SOPA, but their intentions remain the same. You seek to control what you cannot.

We scorn your attempt to pass these bills, and as a result, our discontent at your misaligned efforts grows each day.

You are terrified of your own children, since they are natives in a world where you will always be immigrants. Because you fear them, you entrust your bureaucracies with the parental responsibilities you are too cowardly to confront yourselves. In our world, all the sentiments and expressions of humanity, from the debasing to the angelic, are parts of a seamless whole, the global conversation of bits. We cannot separate the air that chokes from the air upon which wings beat.

In China, Germany, France, Russia, Singapore, Italy, Mexico, Spain, Greece, Egypt, Canada, the United States and many others you are trying to ward off the virus of liberty by erecting guard posts at the frontiers of the Internet. These may keep out the contagion for a small time, but they will not work in a world that is already blanketed in bit-bearing media.

Your increasingly obsolete information industries would perpetuate themselves by proposing laws, in America and elsewhere that claim to own speech itself throughout the world. These laws would declare ideas to be another industrial product, no different than pig iron.

In our world, whatever the human mind may create can be reproduced and distributed infinitely at no cost. The global conveyance of thought no longer requires your factories to accomplish.

These increasingly hostile and colonial measures place us in the same position as those previous lovers of freedom and self-determination who had to reject the authorities of distant, uninformed powers. We must declare our presence in the world we have created immune to your sovereignty, even as we continue to consent to your rule over our bodies. We will spread ourselves across the Planet so that no one can arrest our thoughts.

We will create a civilization of the Mind in the Internet. We have created a medium where all may partake in the forbidden fruit of knowledge, where egalitarianism reigns true. May our society be more humane and fair than yours.

We are the Internet.
We are free.
 


Posted via email from Pier 51

Monday, March 05, 2012

The Best and the Brightest

"I saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by
madness"
-Allen Ginsberg
 
 
Some of the most intelligent and most talented people I have met have been homeless and/or substance abusers. If I was a deluded conspiracy theorist, I'd think that there was some sort of concerted effort to level the playing field by destroying the best and the brightest. By reviewing the last sixty years of our nation's history, I'd probably be able to make a pretty good case for it. An unbiased study that traced the eventual destinations of the smartest grade school students of the past sixty years would reveal some interesting data, I'm sure.

Posted via email from Pier 51

Saturday, March 03, 2012

The Peter Principle 1.2

If one has demonstrated an aptitude for a particular task, it will be the one thing that they will never be allowed to do.

Posted via email from Pier 51

Wednesday, February 29, 2012


Cui Bono

"Every society consists of an organized minority controlling an unorganized majority."
                                                             -Dick Eastman
When one has the ability to manipulate people like chess pieces, it doesn't really matter who appears to be in power. Despite clever rhetoric and deceptive social engineering tactics, it is difficult to disguise the more blatant aspects of "cause and effect". Regardless of their ingenuity level, most people eventually reveal their true intentions.

Wednesday, February 08, 2012

 The Lunatic Fringe

But then I sigh and, with a piece of scripture,
Tell them that God bids us do good for evil;
And thus I clothe my naked villiany
With odd old ends stol'n forth of Holy Writ,
And seem a saint when most I play the devil.
                                                     
 -Shakespeare
 Richard III


Throughout the years, lunatic-fringe Christians have lied about me, stalked me, threatened me, stoled from me, sabotaged me, (attributing it to either "the devil" or, worse yet, to "God's will"), attempted to bribe me and have invaded my privacy.These very same terrorists have then had the audacity to question why I refrain from attending their churches. Some people have very strange recruitment techniques.

Monday, February 06, 2012

Guilt
"There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted-and you create a nation of law-breakers-and then you cash in on guilt."
"I mean that there is no way to disarm any man," said Dr. Ferris, "except through guilt. Through that which he himself has accepted as guilt. If a man has ever stolen a dime, you can impose on him the punishment intended for a bank robber and he will take it. He'll bear any form of misery, he'll feel that he deserved no better. If there is not enough guilt in the world, we must create it. If we teach a man that it's evil to look at spring flowers and he believes us and then does it-we'll be able to do whatever we please with him. He won't defend himself. He won't feel he's worth it. He won't fight. But save us from the man who lives up to his own standards. save us from the man of clean conscience. He's the man who'll beat us."
                                                                                                                                                                   -Ayn Rand
 Atlas Shrugged

Wednesday, February 01, 2012

Isolation

“Before you diagnose yourself with depression or low self-esteem, first make sure that you are not, in fact, just surrounded by assholes.
— William Gibson
 
Sometimes isolation can be a good thing.
 
 

Posted via email from Pier 51

Monday, January 30, 2012

Thoughtcrime

FBI Seeks Social Media X-Ray Machine

By 

 

Uncle Sam's top cops want a new app for peering into social media to see what people are saying that might involve illegal activity or pose threats to national security.

Spy eye
©Mark Wiens/ Getty Images

The FBI put out a request for information this month as part of market research for its proposed new "social media application" project, to see if the information technology industry actually has the capability to build what it wants. Responses from technology companies and other potential vendors are due by Feb. 10.

Privacy advocates generally oppose government monitoring of social media, but so much social media chatter is already public that it won't be easy to stop development of the analytical app the FBI wants. PC World called it a "social network spy app."

The CIA already routinely monitors social media for global threats, as NPR reported in a story last week when it took a closer look at the CIA's Open Source Center for foreign intelligence. Analysts at the center, reportedly is housed in an office building in McLean, Va., told the visiting reporter they consider themselves "ninja libarians."

The FBI's information request document describes its project as an "open source and social media alert, mapping and analysis application." The social media monitoring feature would be part of a broader electronic surveillance and analytical system the FBI is developing, which includes extensive geo-location and mapping features.

Goals of the social media monitoring app, the FBI document states, would include:

  • "detecting potential threats"
  • "developing threat profiles"
  • "outline possible courses-of-action
  • "determine time frame for action by bad actors"
  • "identify and develop tactical picture of the location for threat events"
  • "develop intelligence products for counter-measures"

In its document, the FBI stated that social media already is a "valued source of information" to its intelligence teams. "Social media has become a primary source of intelligence," the document said, " because it has become the premier first response to key events and the primal alert to possible developing situations."

Posted via email from Pier 51

Internet Censorship

"Everything which degrades culture shortens the path to servitude."
                                                             -Camus
I have been on the Internet for a long time. I have communicated with engineers, scientists, coders, writers, artists, designers and with some of the most intelligent people on the planet. Intellectuals do not care what you look like or what you believe in. They care about what you can do. Only ignorant, insecure control freaks fear the Internet.
The recent attempts to muzzle the web reveal the true colors of the "powers that be". Just as the "war on drugs" and the "war on terror' were excuses to circumvent the Bill of Rights, the war on piracy has been an excuse to censor the web.
The mainstream media and Washington have been in bed for a long time. Some media outlets appear to be nothing more than the PR departments of certain government sectors. When you have a monopoly on the manipulation of public opinion, I guess it's difficult to accept that a thirteen year old blogger in Peoria may have the ability to undermine your efforts.
Take a good look at what these people are trying to censor. Are they going after porno sites? Are they attacking gambling sites? Of course not. They generate way too much income. They're attempting to stifle social media sites; sites that allow people that don't own newspapers, publishing companies or TV studios to express their views to the world. What more evidence do you need?

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Ayn Rand

"No one can tell men what they must live for. No one can take that right-because there are things in men, in the best of us, which are above all states, above all collectives! Do you ask: what thing? Man's mind and his values. Look into yourself, honestly and fearlessly. Look and don't tell me, don't tell anyone, just tell yourself: what are you living for?
Aren't you living for yourself and only for yourself? call it your aim, your love, your cause-isn't it still your cause? Give your life, die for your ideal-isn't it still your ideal? Every honest man lives for himself. The one who doesn't-doesn't live at all. You cannot change it. You cannot change it because that's the way man is born, alone, complete, an end in himself. No laws, no Party, no G.P.U. will ever kill that thing in man which knows how to say 'I'. You cannot enslave men's mind, you can only destroy it. You have tried. Now look at what you're getting. Look at those whom you allow to triumph. Deny the best in men-and see what will survive. Do we want the crippled, creeping, crawling, broken monstrosities that we're producing? Are we not castrating life in order to perpetuate it?"
"And who-in this damned universe-who can tell me why I should live for anything but for that which I want? Who can answer that in human sounds that speak for human reason?...But you've tried to tell us what we should want. You came as a solemn army to bring a new life to men. You tore that life you knew nothing about, out of their guts-and you told them what it had to be. You took their every hour, every minute, every nerve, every thought in the farthest corners of their souls-and you told them what it had to be. You came and forbade life to the living. You're driven us all into an iron cellar and you've closed all doors, and you've locked us airtight, airtight till the blood vessels of our spirits burst! Then you stare and wonder what it's doing to us. Well, then, look! All of you who have eyes left- look!"

                                                                                                                 -Ayn Rand
                                                                                                                 We The Living
                                                                       
Russia in the 1920's and present day Santa Barbara have a few things in common.

Wednesday, January 11, 2012